My collection consists of WW II standard service rifles from various countries involved in the war. There's a big hole in my collection that needs to be
filled by an M1 Garand.
Recently, I came across a Springfield M1 at my local gun shop. The receiver/barrel match (3/44) and it has lock bar sights. I believe that it has a Revision
18 bolt which appears to coincide with the mfg date. (Although I can't confirm it in Scott Duff's book.) That's about the extent of the
"originalness" of the rifle. The OP rod is marked "NM", the wood has been replaced and the trigger group is IHC. I brought a throat
erosion gauge and it measured 4. I don't have a muzzle gauge but it didn't appear to be horrible. The barrel was not pitted but the lands were not very
sharp. It's been shot a lot but taken care of. There's a marking on the left side of the barrel near the muzzle (looks like an importer mark) but I
couldn't really read it. I know several guys at the shop and trust what they say. I was told that they thought it was a Korean rifle (meaning that it had
been used in WW II and then Korea). They are asking $695 for the rifle. My allowance is up to $1,000.
My question is this: Do you think it would be worth it to buy this rifle and try to restore it? I've got Scott Duff's books and I'm looking for a
project gun. I'm not looking for MOA accuracy but I would like a half decent shooter. I'm looking more for historical accuracy. I've been looking
at some of the auctions and haven't seen much.
I was planning on getting a "Correct Grade" CMP Garand but all of the Springfields are starting at 5.4 million. So, that rules out WW II. Would I be
better off taking my chances with a service grade CMP rifle? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.



